| |
|
|
Unblocking the Pivot By, Sharon Weizenbaum
Many of the presentations associated with the classic formulas from the Shang Han Lun and other classic texts can be understood in the context of Zang Fu, 8 principle, 6 pathogen and Qi, Blood, and body fluid theory. To look at a just a few of many examples:
Though there are many other ways to think about and use these classic formulas, most of them can be thought about and analyzed in the context of standard TCM. However, there are some formula presentations from the classic Shang Han and Wen Bing texts that do not fall easily into TCM patterns. Because of this, some of these formulas are hardly used at all, are misunderstood and therefore misused, or are used merely symptomatically. At any rate, they are not used to the full extent of their potential if we only understand them in the context of standard TCM. As an introduction to the course I will be teaching at the 2008 Pacific Symposium, I will briefly write here about some formulas that fall into the category of "hard to understand the presentation of it in a TCM context". These formulas will come from both the Shang Han and Wen Bing texts. I'll also discuss a central reason why these presentations cannot be understood through our standard means and hint at the clinical possibilities that appear when we open up our thinking about them. The courses that follow from this article will give a much more in-depth understanding of these formulas, what they all have in common, how to diagnostically differentiate them, as well as their wide range of clinical relevance. The course will include translations from a variety of sources as well as illustrative case histories from my own practice. The following formulas all have something in common that is related to the fact that they fall into the "hard to understand the presentation of it in a TCM context" category. From the Shang Han Lun Xiao Chai Hu Tang (Minor Bupleurum Decoction) Ban Xia Xie Xin Tang (Pinellia Heart-Draining Decoction) Sheng Jiang Xie Xin Tang (Fresh Ginger Heart-Draining Decoction) Gan Cao Xie Xin Tang (Licorice\ Heart-Draining Decoction) From the Wen Bing school Hao Qin Qing Dan Tang (Artemisia Annua and Scutellaria Decoction to Clear the Gallbladder) Lei Shi Xuan Tou Mo Yuan Fa (Lei's Decoction to Disseminate and Vent the Membrane Source) Da Yuan Yin(Reach the Membrane Source Decoction) and Wen Dan Tang (Warm the Gallbladder Decoction) Wen Dan Tang, Warm the Gallbladder Decoction. The 3 principle commonalities shared between the presentations of these formulas can be summarized as follows:
The connection between these locations is not a new idea. Many scholar-doctors over the centuries have written about them synonymously. For example, The Basic Questions (su wen) says "The Shao Yao is the Pivot" The Systemic Differentiation of Damp-Heat (She re tiao bian) says "The membrane source is located between the Stomach and the muscle layer. It reaches the muscles externally and the Stomach internally, and is the gate of the Triple Burner.It is in the halfexterior and half-interior part of the body." "Both the Gallbladder and the Triple Burner belong to the lesser Yang and impairment of Gallbladder free coursing and/or impairment of the Triple Burner's regulation of the waterways are often described in terms of inhibition of the 'pivot mechanism'". You Zaijing writes "Shao Yang resides between the external and internal. It is the place of the Huang membrane, which is between the heart and diaphragm. Externally it does not reach the skin and internally it does not reach the Zang Fu" Admittedly, for English speaking scholars and Chinese scholars alike, some of these definitions are enigmatic and have been debated and mulled over for centuries. My interest in looking at them as synonymous is to observe the clinical insight and clinical results we can get if we look at it this way. I certainly don't mean to imply that this is the only correct way to consider these terms. In addition, the definitions of some of these terms, such as Mo Yuan, Huang Membrane, and even the pivot, are vague at best and have been hotly debated. For the sake of this short article though, in my own words, I will introduce how I have come to classify these formula presentations in a similar category. Taking a broad view of physiology and pathology, there is the metaphor of the see-saw: If we say that healthy physiology is a balance between the two sides of the see-saw and that pathology is an imbalance between the two sides, this means that when there is an imbalance, the see-saw does not move properly or in a balanced way and that this is because the sides are not balanced between each other. With the diagnosis we come to and the formulas we use, we strive to identify and treat the imbalance so that the see-saw can move evenly and smoothly. We determine where and what we need to add and subtract. I would call the ability to diagnose such imbalances the same as being able to diagnose in a standard TCM manner. Continuing with the metaphor of the see-saw, there is another type of problem that can disrupt balanced movement in addition to differential problems between the two sides. If there is a problem with the fulcrum (also known as the pivot, middle or hinge) itself, the movement of the see-saw will also be disrupted. It may appear as if there is an imbalance on one side or the other if we simply observe the way the two sides are moving. However, it may actually be a problem with the pivot. Any attempt to diagnose the\ imbalance through even the best TCM diagnosis will be inaccurate and give poor results because the location of the disruption is not being addressed. It becomes clear why pivot pathology is difficult to place in a standard TCM diagnostic frame. I have listed eight prescriptions above. Though this is not an exhaustive list of the prescriptions for addressing issues with the pivot, it does provide us with a substantial beginning for understanding the nature of pivot physiology and pathology, for differentiating the possible ways the pivot can be disrupted, and for learning how to recognize and differentiate appropriate treatment of the pivot. Since being able to identify and differentiate pivot pathology, I've observed many interesting and inspiring clinical outcomes. Symptoms that I would have or did diagnose through Zang Fu, 8 parameter, Qi, blood and body fluid, and 6 pathogen paradigms, unravel when the pivot is correctly identified as the issue and is properly addressed. Some examples of pathology I've successfully treated with this method are:
There are several steps required in identifying a pivot difficulty. The first is to identify that it is a pivot difficulty. The second is to identify the nature of the difficulty and the appropriate formula presentation. In other words, the second step is to identify the correct pivot formula to use. These steps can be talked about separately, but in the clinical reality they are not really so separate. In regard to this, there are several\ points to make.
My hope in writing this article is to whet the reader's appetite for more in-depth insight into this treatment strategy, as well as to offer a clarifying perspective on some obscure concepts in our field without sacrificing clinical applicability. In the course that follows this paper, we will look more deeply at the physiological and pathological mechanism of the pivot, deconstruct the symptom presentations and formula compositions, demonstrate the abdominal and tongue presentations, and take a look at some case histories. In addition, source material, including case histories, translated by this author will be made available. OM REFERENCES: |
| prospective studentscurrent studentsalumnicampusesabout our clinicpacific symposiumnews & eventspublications |
Copyright ©2002-05 Pacific College of
Oriental Medicine. All rights reserved.
|